Determines Proposal is Inadequate in Multiple Respects, Including Value, Conditionality and Complexity Expects Continuing Progress on Transformation Plan to Provide Superior Value to Atmel Stockholders
"Atmel's Board has determined that Microchip and ON's highly conditional proposal significantly undervalues Atmel and would deprive Atmel stockholders of the greater value that can be achieved through the continued execution of the Company's transformation plan," said David Sugishita, Chairman of Atmel's Board of Directors.
Steven Laub, Atmel's President and Chief Executive Officer, commented, "Atmel's Board and management are committed to enhancing stockholder value. This commitment has driven the decisive actions we have taken to improve and restructure nearly every aspect of Atmel's operations. These initiatives are well underway and are just beginning to unlock the value inherent in Atmel. Indeed, our outstanding third quarter results announced today demonstrate the clear progress we are making. We will continue to take all appropriate steps, including selling or shutting down those businesses that do not meet our financial or strategic objectives, to ensure that we build on this momentum and realize Atmel's full potential."
Following is the text of the letter that was sent today to Steven Sanghi, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Microchip Technology, and to Keith Jackson, President and Chief Executive Officer of ON Semiconductor:
Dear Messrs. Sanghi and Jackson:
We received your unsolicited, non-binding public proposal dated October 1,
2008, to engage in negotiations for a three-way agreement to acquire Atmel
for $5.00 per share in cash, subject to numerous conditions, including the
sale of assets, due diligence and financing. After a comprehensive
review, and with advice from our outside financial and legal advisors,
Atmel's Board of Directors has concluded that your proposal is inadequate
in multiple respects -- it significantly undervalues Atmel, is
unacceptably conditional and subject to significant execution risk.
While we appreciate your recognition of Atmel's superior product and
technology portfolio, we believe your proposal is opportunistic and not
consistent with the Atmel Board of Directors' objective of maximizing
stockholder value. Accordingly, the Board has unanimously rejected your
proposal as not in the best interest of Atmel's stockholders.
We believe it is important to set the record straight with respect to our
discussions with you prior to October 1, 2008. Despite your claims,
Microchip never made a proposal to Atmel prior to its October 1
unsolicited proposal. You also falsely stated during your joint investor
call that we told you that "the Board of Atmel did not want to do this
deal under any circumstances, under any terms, at this time." What we
both know really occurred is that Microchip sought confidential and
sensitive due diligence information for a possible multi-party transaction
without specifying a price or any other terms. Your publicly announced
October 1 proposal was the first time Microchip disclosed to us a proposed
price, structure, ON Semiconductor's involvement, and the many significant
associated conditions, including the financing required by ON. Atmel's
Board takes its fiduciary duties seriously. Given the risks,
uncertainties and competitive issues of your approach, we believe the
interests of Atmel's stockholders, employees and customers will be better
served by continuing to pursue our transformation plan that we expect will
generate substantially greater stockholder value.
Atmel's Board has carefully considered your proposal and has determined
that it is inadequate in multiple respects. In arriving at this
conclusion, the Board considered that:
Atmel is currently implementing an aggressive transformation plan,
improving both Atmel's cost structure and product focus. Contrary to your
assertions, we are achieving significant success in this regard.
-- Non-core manufacturing facilities have been shut down and sold,
reducing Atmel's fabs from five to two by the end of 2008. We have
divested or shut down 14 non-core product lines, while consolidating or
streamlining others. We have also implemented an 18% reduction in the
Company's workforce and expect to realize more than $125 million of
cost savings in 2008, well in excess of our target of $80 million to
$95 million.
-- As a result of these and other actions still underway, Atmel is
achieving stronger financial performance as evidenced by the 400 basis
point improvement in gross margins over the last two quarters alone.
-- In addition, our microcontroller business is achieving substantial
revenue growth, market share gains and margin expansion. Indeed, our
microcontroller growth rate of 21% for the September quarter year-over-
year substantially exceeded that of Microchip's at 5.5%.
-- We expect that the combination of normalizing currency trends and the
continued benefits from our ongoing restructuring will result in
further improvement in our operating and financial performance.
Your unsolicited proposal is highly opportunistic and delivers neither
fair nor full value to Atmel's stockholders. Given our progress and the
actions Atmel's Board and management are continuing to take, we are
confident that Atmel stockholders will realize greater value through the
continued execution of the Company's strategic plan.
-- Microchip and ON's proposal is clearly an opportunistic attempt to
acquire our leading technology and product portfolio at a time of value
compression in the equity markets and just as our progress is becoming
more visible in the Company's financial results.
-- Simple calculations show that your proposal significantly undervalues
the Company. Based on the value that ON has ascribed to Atmel's
RF/Auto and non-volatile memory business units, Microchip would be
acquiring Atmel's microcontroller business at a substantial discount to
its true value, despite accelerating revenue growth, market share gains
and margin expansion. As stated in your joint investor call "Atmel has
strong momentum in proprietary AVR architecture."
-- In your joint investor presentation, you identified "Significant
opportunities to drive operational synergies across COGS, SG&A and
R&D." However, the proposal fails to provide any value to Atmel
stockholders for the substantial synergies that you anticipate
achieving.
Microchip and ON's complex proposal is highly conditional and subject to
significant execution risk. Among other things, the proposed transaction
depends on Microchip and ON's ability to agree to terms and close a
significant, separate purchase and sale transaction.
-- The proposal requires Microchip and ON to reach a definitive agreement
on price, as well as a complex separation of Atmel's businesses, which
today share a number of significant functions. There is no assurance
that such an agreement can be reached.
-- The proposal requires Microchip and ON to each receive necessary
regulatory clearance for their acquisitions of competing businesses,
obtain necessary financing, and meet all other closing conditions
before any transaction with Atmel can close. There is no assurance
such financing will be received, or that any other conditions of the
complex three-way transactions will be met, and if they are, no
certainty as to how long they will take.
-- The proposal is subject to due diligence by Microchip and ON, and would
require Atmel to provide major competitors with access to Atmel's
sensitive, confidential information with no assurance that a
transaction will be entered into on acceptable terms. Microchip and
ON's inadequate and highly conditional proposal provides no basis to
grant such access.
The proposal requires ON to obtain hundreds of millions of dollars of new
financing at a time when the credit markets are essentially closed.
-- You claimed in your letter and joint investor call that ON would
finance part of its purchase of Atmel's non-volatile memory and RF and
Automotive businesses through "borrowing of approximately $260 million
under ON Semiconductor's existing credit facility." Our review
indicates that ON has no such commitment under its existing credit
facility to provide additional financing. ON's existing facility
merely allows ON to seek to raise a new and separate $260 million
facility. ON has acknowledged that it will need financing even beyond
that, which may require refinancing the existing credit facility. This
lack of any financing commitment, together with your misstatements
regarding the same, are of particular concern given the current
uncertain economic and credit environment.
In closing, we believe your stated confidence in your proposal is very
much misplaced. We share your excitement about Atmel's leading product
and technology portfolio and our talented employee base. Based on these
strengths, the solid plan we have in place and the actions we are
continuing to take to fully unlock the value of the Company, we believe
your opportunistic proposal significantly undervalues Atmel and would
deprive Atmel stockholders of the greater value that can be achieved
through the continued execution of the Company's transformation plan.
Sincerely,
/s/ Steven Laub
Steven Laub
President and Chief Executive Officer
1 | 2 Next Page »
